4.7 Article

Milky Way mass with K giants and BHB stars using LAMOST, SDSS/SEGUE, and Gaia: 3D spherical Jeans equation and tracer mass estimator

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2036

关键词

stars: individual: BHB; stars: individual: K giants; galaxies: individual: Milky Way; stars: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: halo; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: stellar content

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11890694, 11873057, 11873052, 12025302, 11873034, 11988101, 11773052, 11761131016]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0404501]
  3. China Manned Space Project [CMS-CSST-2021-B03]
  4. China Space Station Telescope Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies Survey on Dust and Extinction Project [CMS-CSST-2021-A09, CMS-CSST-2021-A08]
  5. 111 Project of the Ministry of Education of China [B20019]
  6. Hubei Provincial Outstanding Youth Fund [2019CFA087]
  7. Aliyun Fellowship, Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative [2016PE010, 2021PM0055]
  8. Postdoctoral Scholar's Fellowship of LAMOST
  9. National Development and Reform Commission
  10. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  11. National Science Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  13. University of Arizona
  14. Brazilian Participation Group
  15. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  16. Carnegie Mellon University
  17. University of Florida
  18. French Participation Group
  19. German Participation Group
  20. Harvard University
  21. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  22. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  23. Johns Hopkins University
  24. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  25. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  26. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  27. New Mexico State University
  28. New York University
  29. Ohio State University
  30. Pennsylvania State University
  31. University of Portsmouth
  32. Princeton University
  33. Spanish Participation Group
  34. University of Tokyo
  35. University of Utah
  36. Vanderbilt University
  37. University of Virginia
  38. University of Washington
  39. Yale University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using stellar halo samples, this study estimates the mass distribution and dark matter mass of the Milky Way through two methods. The results show reasonable consistency across different samples and methods.
We measure the enclosed Milky Way mass profile to Galactocentric distances of similar to 70 and similar to 50 kpc using the smooth, diffuse stellar halo samples of Bird et al. The samples are Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey/Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SDSS/SEGUE) K giants (KG) and SDSS/SEGUE blue horizontal branch (BHB) stars with accurate metallicities. The 3D kinematics are available through LAMOST and SDSS/SEGUE distances and radial velocities and Gaia DR2 proper motions. Two methods are used to estimate the enclosed mass: 3D spherical Jeans equation and Evans et al. tracer mass estimator (TME). We remove substructure via the Xue et al. method based on integrals of motion. We evaluate the uncertainties on our estimates due to random sampling noise, systematic distance errors, the adopted density profile, and non-virialization and non-spherical effects of the halo. The tracer density profile remains a limiting systematic in our mass estimates, although within these limits we find reasonable agreement across the different samples and the methods applied. Out to similar to 70 and similar to 50 kpc, the Jeans method yields total enclosed masses of 4.3 +/- 0.95 (random) +/- 0.6 (systematic) x 10(11) M-circle dot and 4.1 +/- 1.2 (random) +/- 0.6 (systematic) x 10(11) M-circle dot for the KG and BHB stars, respectively. For the KG and BHB samples, we find a dark matter virial mass of M-200 = 0.55(-0.11)(+0.15) (random) +/- 0.083 (systematic) x 10(12) M-circle dot and M-200 = 1.00(-0.33)(+0.67) (random) +/- 0.15 (systematic) x 10(12) M-circle dot, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据