4.7 Article

Lessons from the massive relic NGC 1277: Remaining in situstar formation in the cores of massive galaxies

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2070

关键词

galaxies: stellar content; star formation; evolution

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU) [SEV-2015-054816-4, BES-2016-078409]
  2. Postdoctoral Junior Leader Fellowship Programme from la Caixa Foundation [LCF/BQ/LI18/11630007]
  3. Severo Ochoa Excellence scheme [SEV-2015-0548, CEX2019-000920-S]
  4. MCIU [PID2019-107427GB-C32]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By analyzing NGC 1277, researchers shed light on the origin of young stars in massive early-type galaxies and found a similar mass fraction of young stars as in other galaxies.
Near-ultraviolet (NUV) spectroscopic studies have suggested that passively evolving massive, early-type galaxies host sub-one per cent fractions of young stars in their innermost regions. We shed light on the origin of these stars by analysing NGC 1277, a widely studied nearby prototypical massive compact relic galaxy. These are rare galaxies that have survived without experiencing significant size evolution via accretion and mergers since their formation at high redshift. We obtain a spectrum in the UV range within the central 1 kpc region of NGC 1277. We compare a carefully selected set of optical and NUV line-strengths to model predictions with star formation histories characteristic of massive galaxies. We find a 0.8 per cent mass fraction of young stars in the centre of NGC 1277, similar to that found in massive early-type galaxies. Given the limited accretion history of NGC 1277, these results favour an intrinsic, in situ, process triggering star formation at later epochs. Our results suggest a general constraint on the amount of young stars in the cores of massive early-type galaxies. This amount should be assumed as an upper limit for the young stellar contribution in massive galaxies, as there might be present other contributions from evolved stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据