4.7 Article

Formation of black holes in the pair-instability mass gap: Evolution of a post-collision star

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2222

关键词

black hole physics; stars: black holes; stars: evolution; stars: massive

资金

  1. European Research Council [770017]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [770017] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the formation of black holes in the pair-instability mass gap through star-star collisions, showing that the collision scenario is a suitable formation channel to populate the gap where the existence of black holes has been detected.
The detection of GW190521 by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration has revealed the existence of black holes (BHs) in the pair-instability (PI) mass gap. Here, we investigate the formation of BHs in the PI mass gap via star-star collisions in young stellar clusters. To avoid PI, the stellar-collision product must have a relatively small core and a massive envelope. We generate our initial conditions from the outputs of a hydrodynamical simulation of the collision between a core helium burning star (similar to 58 M-circle dot) and a main-sequence star (similar to 42 M-circle dot). The hydrodynamical simulation allows us to take into account the mass lost during the collision (similar to 12 M-circle dot) and to build the chemical composition profile of the post-collision star. We then evolve the collision product with the stellar evolution codes parsec and mesa. We find that the post-collision star evolves through all the stellar burning phases until core collapse, avoiding PI. At the onset of core collapse, the post-collision product is a blue supergiant star. We estimate a total mass-loss of about 1 M-circle dot during the post-collision evolution, due to stellar winds and shocks induced by neutrino emission in a failed supernova. The final BH mass is approximate to 87 M-circle dot. Therefore, we confirm that the collision scenario is a suitable formation channel to populate the PI mass gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据