4.6 Article

Competing Metal-Ligand Interactions in Tris(cyclopentadienyl)-cyclohexylisonitrile Complexes of Trivalent Actinides and Lanthanides

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27123811

关键词

f elements; actinides; lanthanides; cyclopentadienyl; cyclohexylisonitrile; structure; bonding; XRD; NMR; DFT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structures and bonding properties of 16 complexes formed by trivalent f elements with cyclopentadienyl and cyclohexylisonitrile ligands were studied, and the interactions between actinides and lanthanides were compared. The results show that the anionic Cp and neutral C equivalent to NCy ligands have comparable interactions with the metals in the complexes, and there are small but characteristic differences between actinide and lanthanide complexes.
The structure and bonding properties of 16 complexes formed by trivalent f elements (M=U, Np, Pu and lanthanides except for Pm and Pr) with cyclopentadienyl (Cp) and cyclohexylisonitrile (C equivalent to NCy) ligands, (Cp)(3)M(C equivalent to NCy), were studied by a joint experimental (XRD, NMR) and theoretical (DFT) analysis. For the large La(III) ion, the bis-adduct (Cp)(3)La(C equivalent to NCy)(2) could also be synthesized and characterized. The metal-ligand interactions, focusing on the comparison of the actinides and lanthanides as well as on the competition of the two different ligands for M, were elucidated using the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) and Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) models. The results point to interactions of comparable strengths with the anionic Cp and neutral C equivalent to NCy ligands in the complexes. The structural and bonding properties of the actinide complexes reflect small but characteristic differences with respect to the lanthanide analogues. They include larger ligand-to-metal charge transfers as well as metal-ligand electron-sharing interactions. The most significant experimental marker of these covalent interactions is the C equivalent to N stretching frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据