4.6 Article

Influence of Cotton Pre-Treatment on Dyeing with Onion and Pomegranate Peel Extracts

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27144547

关键词

cotton yarn; scouring; chemical bleaching; mercerization; natural dyes

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of Republic Croatia
  2. University of Zagreb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the possibility of using natural dyes on cellulose fibers, specifically cotton, and examines the impact of pre-treatments and mordants on color and fastness properties. Results show that mercerization has a positive effect on dye absorption and bonding, and pomegranate peel natural dye demonstrates better wash and light fastness properties.
In this paper the possibility of applying natural dyes on cellulose fibres were researched with respect to the impact of cotton material pre-treatment (scouring, chemical bleaching, mercerization and mordanting), using renewable sources of natural dyes (waste as a source). As mordants, metal salts of copper, aluminium and ferrum were used, and the influence on colour change as well as on fastness properties were analysed. The natural dyes were extracted from onion peel (Allium cepa L.) and pomegranate peel (Punica granatum L.). In spectrophotometric analysis performed of the plant extracts, the onion extract has peaks at 400 and 500 nm, resulting in red-orange colourations and the pomegranate extract shows a maximum at 400 nm, i.e., in the yellow region, which is characteristic of punicalin. Results show significant influence of cotton pre-treatments on colour appearance and fastness properties, caused by pre-treatments affecting the properties and structure of the cotton itself. The positive effect of mercerization on dye absorption and bonding is confirmed. For wash and light fastness properties, more satisfactory results have been obtained for yarns dyed with pomegranate peel natural dye, and the key importance of mordants for fastness properties has been confirmed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据