4.6 Article

Facile Microfluidic Fabrication of Biocompatible Hydrogel Microspheres in a Novel Microfluidic Device

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27134013

关键词

hydrogel particles; microgel; droplet microfluidics; biocompatible microspheres; photopolymerization; swelling behaviour; free-radical polymerisation; poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate; UV irradiation; entrapped nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) microgels with tuneable size and porosity have various applications. The microgels were produced using modular droplet microfluidics and their properties were studied.
Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) microgels with tuneable size and porosity find applications as extracellular matrix mimics for tissue-engineering scaffolds, biosensors, and drug carriers. Monodispersed PEGDA microgels were produced by modular droplet microfluidics using the dispersed phase with 49-99 wt% PEGDA, 1 wt% Darocur 2959, and 0-50 wt% water, while the continuous phase was 3.5 wt% silicone-based surfactant dissolved in silicone oil. Pure PEGDA droplets were fully cured within 60 s at the UV light intensity of 75 mW/cm(2). The droplets with higher water content required more time for curing. Due to oxygen inhibition, the polymerisation started in the droplet centre and advanced towards the edge, leading to a temporary solid core/liquid shell morphology, confirmed by tracking the Brownian motion of fluorescent latex nanoparticles within a droplet. A volumetric shrinkage during polymerisation was 1-4% for pure PEGDA droplets and 20-32% for the droplets containing 10-40 wt% water. The particle volume increased by 36-50% after swelling in deionised water. The surface smoothness and sphericity of the particles decreased with increasing water content in the dispersed phase. The porosity of swollen particles was controlled from 29.7% to 41.6% by changing the water content in the dispersed phase from 10 wt% to 40 wt%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据