4.5 Article

Evaluation of Protein Extraction Methods for Metaproteomic Analyses of Root-Associated Microbes

期刊

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 977-988

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-05-22-0116-TA

关键词

endosphere; metaproteomics; microbiome; microbiota; phytobiome; plant-microbe interactions; rhizoplane

资金

  1. North Carolina State Plant Soil Microbial Community Consortium
  2. United States National Science Foundation [IOS-2033621]
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2021-67013-34537]
  4. NovoNordisk Foundation INTERACT project [NNF19SA0059360]
  5. National Science Foundation [IOS-1917270]
  6. Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0014395]
  7. HHMI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metaproteomics is a powerful tool for studying microbial communities, including plant-associated microbiota. This study optimized and evaluated protein extraction methods for metaproteomics of plant-associated microbiota in Arabidopsis and maize. The researchers identified two extraction methods that yield the highest number of identified microbial proteins in each plant species, providing valuable reference for future optimization in other plants.
Metaproteomics is a powerful tool for the characterization of metabolism, physiology, and functional interactions in microbial communities, including plant-associated microbiota. However, the metaproteomic methods that have been used to study plant-associated microbiota are very laborious and require large amounts of plant tissue, hindering wider application of these methods. We optimized and evaluated different protein extraction methods for metaproteomics of plant-associatedmicrobiota in two different plant species (Arabidopsis andmaize). Our main goal was to identify a method thatwouldworkwith lowamounts of input material (40 to 70 mg) and that would maximize the number of identified microbial proteins. We tested eight protocols, each comprising a different combination of physical lysis method, extraction buffer, and cell-enrichment method on roots from plants grown with synthetic microbial communities. We assessed the performance of the extraction protocols by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics and found that the optimal extraction method differed between the two species. For Arabidopsis roots, protein extraction by beating whole roots with small beads provided the greatest number of identified microbial proteins and improved the identification of proteins from gram-positive bacteria. For maize, vortexing root pieces in the presence of large glass beads yielded the greatest number of microbial proteins identified. Based on these data, we recommend the use of these two methods for metaproteomics with Arabidopsis and maize. Furthermore, detailed descriptions of the eight tested protocols will enable future optimization of protein extraction for metaproteomics in other dicot and monocot plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据