4.6 Review

A Review of Molecular Interplay between Neurotrophins and miRNAs in Neuropsychological Disorders

期刊

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 10, 页码 6260-6280

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02966-5

关键词

Brain; Neurotrophic Factors; CNS; Psychological Disorders; NT3; BDNF

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interactions between neurotrophins and miRNAs play a crucial role in neuropsychological disorders, and hold potential as diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Future clinical studies are needed to validate the potential of targeting neurotrophin-miRNA interactions.
Various neurotrophins (NTs), including nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin-3, and neurotrophin-4, promote cellular differentiation, survival, and maintenance, as well as synaptic plasticity, in the peripheral and central nervous system. The function of microRNAs (miRNAs) and other small non-coding RNAs, as regulators of gene expression, is pivotal for the appropriate control of cell growth and differentiation. There are positive and negative loops between NTs and miRNAs, which exert modulatory effects on different signaling pathways. The interplay between NTs and miRNAs plays a crucial role in the regulation of several physiological and pathological brain procedures. Emerging evidence suggests the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of the interactions between NTs and miRNAs in several neuropsychological disorders, including epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, and drug abuse. Here, we review current data regarding the regulatory interactions between NTs and miRNAs in neuropsychological disorders, for which novel diagnostic and/or therapeutic strategies are emerging. Targeting NTs-miRNAs interactions for diagnostic or therapeutic approaches needs to be validated by future clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据