4.7 Article

Investigation and optimization of PDMS/PES membrane on morphology and performance for methane-water separation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112078

关键词

Separation membrane; Methane detection; Methane permeation; PDMS/PES; PEG

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [55187524, 52075214]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China [2019M650060]
  3. Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department, China [20190303012SF, 20200201058JC, 20200501013GX]
  4. JLU Youth Development Program, China [2020-JCXK-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a new methane-water separation membrane by optimizing the combination of different materials to achieve excellent methane permeability and tensile strength. The influence of porogen and its optimal content were also investigated.
Methane detection is important for exploring combustible ice in energy field. As the core component of the methane sensor, gas-liquid separation membranes play a crucial role in separating methane from water, which can effectively enhance the timeliness and stability of methane detection. Moreover, the correlative permeability and mechanical properties of are contradictory requirements for achieving optimum performance of membranes. Herein, a methane-water separation membrane was developed and optimized by adjusting the PEG as porogen based on PDMS and PES as functional and support layers, respectively. PDMS/PES composite membrane performed an excellent methane permeability and tensile strength. Particularly, the PEG was studied as porogen to affect the morphology and adjust pore structure of the PES layer. Considering the trade-off of methane permeability and mechanical properties, the results indicate the appropriate content of porogen is 4 wt% PEG. This work optimizes a new approach to prepare methane-water separation membrane and give a significant insight to develop methane detection for exploring new energy in seabed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据