4.7 Article

Maltose-functional metal-organic framework assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry for small biomolecule determination

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 189, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-022-05338-x

关键词

Metal-organic framework; Laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry; Biomolecule determination; Glucose monitoring; Clinical diagnosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22004004, 21804123]
  2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders [2021JSJB02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, functional metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were used as matrices in laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI-MS) for rapid detection of small biomolecules. The developed LDI-MS platform showed advantages of low sample consumption, short analysis time, strong salt tolerance, and satisfactory reproducibility, with potential applications in clinical diagnosis and disease monitoring.
A series of functional metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were facilely prepared through an one-pot procedure or post-synthetic modification strategy and used as matrices in laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (LDI-MS). Compared with traditional organic matrices and other MOFs, maltose-functional MOF MIL-101-maltose demonstrated ultrahigh ionization efficiency, free matrix background, uniform crystallization, and good dispersibility. A simple, general, and efficient LDI-MS platform was developed for rapid detection of various small biomolecules using MIL-101-maltose as matrix, providing several advantages including low sample consumption of 500 nL, short analysis time of few seconds, strong salt tolerance (500 mM NaCl), and satisfactory reproducibility. The MIL-101-maltose matrix was used for serum glucose determination and successfully distinguished the diabetic patients from the healthy controls. This work provides a generic LDI-MS platform for fast determination of small biomolecules with high potential in clinical diagnosis and disease monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据