4.7 Article

Signal on-off ratiometric electrochemical sensor coupled with a molecularly imprinted polymer for the detection of carbendazim

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 189, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-022-05341-2

关键词

Ratiometric electrochemical sensor; Molecularly imprinted polymers; 3D MIP layer; Carbendazim

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22134003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A stable ratiometric electrochemical sensor was introduced for the selective detection of carbendazim. By using a bimetallic nanomaterial as the electrode substrate and in situ fabricating a MIP layer, the excellent selectivity detection of carbendazim was achieved.
A stable ratiometric electrochemical sensor is introduced for the selective detection of carbendazim (CBD). Specifically, the proposed sensor employs a Co@Mo2C bimetallic nanomaterial as the glassy carbon electrode substrate and a layer of molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was in situ fabricated on glassy carbon electrode by electropolymerization, with o-aminophenol as the functional monomer and CBD acting as template. A ratiometric MIP sensor was constructed by adding ferrocene (Fc) internal reference directly to the sample solution. The bimetallic nanomaterials provide a large loading platform for the MIP layer through synergistic effects, amplifying the signal. Excellent CBD binding selectivity is achieved by the templating effect of the three-dimensional (3D) MIP layer. The internal standard is added directly to the electrolyte solution to be tested, allowing the new type of ratiometric electrochemical sensor to avoid the cumbersome steps of other methods and reducing the difficulty and human error of the experimental procedure. Combining a ratiometric strategy with a 3D MIP structure realises the dual-signal detection of CBD. The optimised sensor showed an excellent linear relationship between 0.01 and 1 000 mu M, with a correlation coefficient of 0.997 and a detection limit of 3.4 nM (S/N = 3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据