4.2 Article

Prospects for developing efficient targets for the xenomonitoring and control of Simulium damnosum s.l., the major vectors of onchocerciasis in Africa

期刊

MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 235-246

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mve.12598

关键词

onchocerciasis; simulium; trapping; surveillance and control

资金

  1. Medical Research council of the UK [MR/P027873/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite ethical concerns, few alternatives to Human Landing Catches (HLC) for monitoring Simulium damnosum complex in onchocerciasis have been reported. This study tested visual targets and olfactory stimuli for their attractiveness to blackflies, and found that small sticky black targets of horizontal rectangular shape were the most efficient alternative to HLC.
Despite the ethical issues concerning the continued use of Human Landing Catches (HLC) to monitor the Simulium damnosum complex for epidemiological monitoring of onchocericasis, few attempts to develop alternatives have been reported. In studies on a wild population of S. damnosum in Burkina Faso, we tested visual targets (different sizes and shapes) and olfactory stimuli (CO2, and POCA and BG-lure (R) odour blends) for their ability to attract and collect host seeking blackflies. At each trap, blackflies were caught with appropriately sized electrocuting grids and results from Latin square design tests were compared. Throughout, HLCs captured more blackflies than the targets. Of the traps tested, small targets (0.0625 and 0.5 m(2)) were the most efficient visual lure in terms of the number of S. damnosum captured per unit area 1.7-5x more than larger targets. Overall, results suggested that sticky black targets of horizontal rectangular shape (0.125-0.5 m(2)) and baited with a POCA and/or CO2 mixture could provide a cheap practical field alternative to HLC for onchocerciasis xenomonitoring, subject to confirmation that the design has no inherent bias for certain members of the S. damnosum species complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据