4.3 Article

Effect of Boron and Tungsten Addition on Superplasticity and Grain Growth in Electrodeposited Nickel Alloys

期刊

MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 1001-1005

出版社

JAPAN INST METALS & MATERIALS
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.MT-M2022025

关键词

superplasticity; grain growth; nanocrystalline nickel alloys; electrodeposition

资金

  1. KAKENHI [19K05101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of W and B has different effects on the superplastic deformation and grain growth of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni alloys. The addition of W increases the energy required for grain boundary sliding, thereby inhibiting superplasticity; while the addition of B successfully suppresses grain growth and improves the mechanical properties after superplastic deformation.
The effect of W and B addition on the superplastic deformation and grain growth of electrodeposited nanocrystalline Ni alloys with a crystal grain size of approximately 20 nm was investigated with the aim of improving the mechanical properties by maintaining fine grain sizes during superplastic deformation. A maximum elongation of 12% was recorded for electrodeposited Ni -1.8 at% W at a temperature of 350 degrees C and a strain rate of 1.0 x 10(-4)s(-1). The electrodeposited Ni W failed to exhibit superplasticity because the segregated W at the grain boundaries increased the energy required for grain boundary sliding. In contrast, the electrodeposited Ni-0.06 at% B exhibited superplasticity with a recorded elongation of 362% at a temperature of 450 degrees C and a strain rate of 1.0 x 10(-4)s(-1). With the addition of B, the optimal superplastic strain rates of the electrodeposited Ni-B shifted to lower values than that of the electrodeposited Ni. The grain size and hardness of the electrodeposited Ni-B after superplastic deformation were smaller and higher, respectively, than those of the electrodeposited Ni. The addition of B successfully suppressed grain growth and improved the mechanical properties after superplastic deformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据