4.4 Article

Surface states by grinding thin strips of electrochemically deposited nanocrystalline nickel-iron

期刊

MATERIALS TESTING
卷 64, 期 7, 页码 903-931

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/mt-2022-0015

关键词

electrodeposition; microstructure; nanocrystalline nickel-iron; roughness; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the surface states of electrochemically deposited nanocrystalline nickel-iron thin strips after grinding. The cutting depth and grinding process have an impact on the microstructures and residual stresses on the surfaces. Grinding induces cold plastic deformation and thermoplastic deformation, resulting in changes in residual stresses on the surface.
Thin strips of electrochemically deposited nanocrystalline nickel-iron with thicknesses of 320 or 330 mu m are modified by defined grinding. Small changes in the cutting depth and the variation of the grinding process, up cut or down cut, result in different surface states. X-ray diffraction provides the analyses of the microstructures and residual stresses on the surfaces. In the initial state, the grain sizes have an average value of 9.3 nm, the micro strains 0.74% and the residual stresses predominantly values in the low-pressure range. Up grinding with the smallest depth of cut 1 mu m causes the lowest compressive residual stresses at workpiece surface due to cold plastic deformation. Larger cutting depths and surface temperatures reduce the mechanical effects. Then prevailing thermal effects cause tensile residual stresses through thermoplastic deformation and through changes in the microstructure, which can be observed by grain enlargements and decreases in micro strains. However, the recovery and recrystallization processes are only partial. Down grinding with a cutting depth of 3 mu m thus leads to a maximum grain size increase to 23.4 nm and a maximum decrease in micro strain to 0.41% as well as to maximum residual stresses of 880 MPa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据