4.5 Article

Thermal synthesis of Ga2O3/SnO2 core-shell nanowires and their structural characterization

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115743

关键词

Ga2O3; SnO2; Core-shell nanowires; Structural characterization

资金

  1. National Centre for Research and Development, Poland [1/346922/4/NCBR/2017]
  2. Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange [PPN/BIL/2018/1/00137]
  3. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland - Euro-pean Union within the European Regional Development Fund [POIG.01.01.02-00-008/08-05]
  4. National Centre for Research and Development, Poland through the Applied Research Program [178782, 027/533/L-5/13/NCBR/2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Ga2O3 core-SnO2 shell nanowires were synthesized using thermal evaporation of metallic sources and Au thin layers were used as growth catalyst. Compared to pure gold thin films, nanowires obtained using Au colloid showed a closer resemblance to core-shell structures.
Ga2O3 core-SnO2 shell nanowires were synthesized by thermal evaporation of the metallic sources (Ga, Sn) in a horizontal quartz tube furnace at atmospheric pressure and in an oxidizing atmosphere. Au thin layers and 200 ppm Au colloid were applied as growth catalyst of Ga2O3 nanowires in vapor-liquid-solid method. Then the SnO2 shells were grown on the Ga2O3 nanowires cores. The configuration with highly sensitive shell and a relatively low conductivity core should enhance the efficiency of sensors based on these materials. Such narrowing of conductive area where a depletion of the charge carriers may occur, should increase the sensitivity, response and recovery time. The structural and material composition characterization of nanowires was performed by X-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive X-ray and Raman spectroscopy. The lattice parameters and strain of SnO2 shell were calculated. Using the catalyst in the form of a 200 ppm Au colloid compared to Au thin film, Ga2O3/SnO2 nanowires more similar to the core-shell structures were obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据