4.7 Article

Refinement mechanism of nanoscale Cu-rich precipitates by Mo addition and its effect on strength-toughness of Cu-bearing low carbon high strength steel

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143469

关键词

HSLC steel; Cu-rich precipitate; Mo; Phase field method; Strength and toughness

资金

  1. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [19JCQNJC02100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52074191, 51804217]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Mo element on the precipitation behavior of nanoscale Cu-rich particles in Cu-bearing low carbon high strength steels was investigated. It was found that the addition of Mo refined the size of grain interior Cu-rich particles and inhibited the formation of grain boundary Cu-rich particles. The enrichment of Mo in the matrix suppressed the diffusion of Cu atoms and merger of Cu-rich particles. The CuMo-bearing steel showed increased yield strength and suppressed crack initiation and propagation at grain boundaries, leading to an increment in absorbed energy.
Effect of Mo element on the precipitation behavior of nanoscale Cu-rich particles in Cu-bearing low carbon high strength steels was investigated in this work. The addition of 0.82 wt% Mo refined the size of grain interior Cu-rich particles (ICRPs) from 12 nm to 8 nm, accompanied by the structure changed from 3R-Cu to 9R-Cu. Mo also inhibited the formation of grain boundary Cu-rich particles (BCRPs) with the size of similar to 30 nm. The calculation of phase field method indicated that Mo was repelled from Cu-rich particles and enriched in alpha-Fe matrix, which suppressed the diffusion of Cu atoms and merger of Cu-rich particles. The measured yield strength of CuMo-bearing steel increased by 87 MPa, mainly due to the refinement of ICRPs. The reduction of BCRPs suppressed the crack initiation and propagation at grain boundaries, which contributed to the increment of absorbed energy at -40 degrees C by 41J.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据