4.7 Article

Weathering-independent differentiation of microplastic polymers by reflectance IR spectrometry and pattern recognition

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113897

关键词

Microplastics; Infrared spectrometry; Reflectance; Weathering; Pattern recognition; Variable selection

资金

  1. EU [101003954]
  2. JPI Oceans Program [PCI2020112145]
  3. Spanish Government, MCIN/AEI
  4. European Union
  5. QANAP group (Programa de Consolidacion y Estructuracion de Unidades de Investigacion Competitiva) [ED431C 2021/56]
  6. Universidade da Coruna/CISUG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the use of infrared spectra combined with pattern recognition techniques to identify different polymers, regardless of their aging. The results show that it is possible to successfully identify them using a reduced number of spectral wavenumbers with coherent chemical meaning.
The presence and effects of microplastics in the environment is being continuously studied, so the need for a reliable approach to ascertain the polymer/s constituting them has increased. To characterize them, infrared (IR) spectrometry is commonly applied, either reflectance or attenuated total reflectance (ATR). A common problem when considering field samples is their weathering and biofouling, which modify their spectra. Hence, relying on spectral matching between the unknown spectrum and spectral databases is largely defective. In this paper, the use of IR spectra combined with pattern recognition techniques (principal components analysis, classification and regression trees and support vector classification) is explored first time to identify a collection of typical polymers regardless of their ageing. Results show that it is possible to identify them using a reduced suite of spectral wavenumbers with coherent chemical meaning. The models were validated using two datasets containing artificially weathered polymers and field samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据