4.7 Article

The effects of acidification on arsenic concentration and speciation in offshore shallow water system

期刊

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113930

关键词

Ocean acidification; Arsenic; Speciation; Interaction; Coastal waters

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA11020702]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Development Program of Yantai [2022XDRH009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207059]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2011BQ012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of acidification on speciation and transportation of arsenic in shallow seawater system were investigated through lab scale acidification simulation experiments. The results showed that acidification increased the concentration of DIAs, As5+, and As3+ in the overlying water, while decreasing the ratio of As5+/As3+. Acidification also facilitated the transport of more DIAs into the overlying water from sediments or suspended particulate matters, favoring the existence of As3+.
The effects of acidification on speciation and transportation of arsenic in shallow seawater system were investigated based on data from acidification simulation experiments in lab scale tanks, in which enhanced levels of pCO(2) corresponding to pH(T) were processed. The results showed that: (1) the concentration of DIAs (Dissolved inorganic arsenic), As5+ and As3+ in the overlying water increased with experimental CO2 enrichment; (2) while the ratio of As5+/As3+ decreased; (3) acidification could cause more DIAs transport into the overlying water from sediments or suspended particulate matters, and would be favorable to the existence of As3+. Thus, DIAs is available to microorganisms and can be taken in effectively by microorganisms in the shallow water system, resulting in toxic effects of As on microorganisms and thus the inhibition of the growth of microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据