4.4 Article

Outdoor biting and pyrethroid resistance as potential drivers of persistent malaria transmission in Zanzibar

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04200-y

关键词

Entomology; Malaria transmission; Novel tools; Pyrethroids; Insecticide resistance

资金

  1. United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [AID-OAA-A-14-00057]
  2. President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) under the terms of USAID/JHU [AID-OAA-A-14-00057]
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-016807]
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-016807] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite high coverage of core vector control interventions, low-level malaria transmission persists in Zanzibar. Anopheles arabiensis is the predominant malaria vector, with a higher proportion collected outdoors and in resting sites. Blood-fed mosquitoes obtained blood meals from non-human hosts. The study highlights the need for novel interventions targeting outdoor biting mosquitoes and adaptation of strategies to complement existing interventions.
Background: Low-level of malaria transmission persist in Zanzibar despite high coverage of core vector control interventions. This study was carried out in hot-spot sites to better understand entomological factors that may contribute to residual malaria transmission in Zanzibar. Methods: A total of 135 households were randomly selected from six sites and consented to participate with 20-25 households per site. Mosquito vector surveillance was carried out indoors and outdoors from 6:00 pm-7:00 am using miniaturized double net trap (DN-Mini (TM)). Additional collections were done indoors using mouth aspirators to retrieve resting mosquitoes from wall and ceiling surfaces, and outdoors using resting bucket and pit traps. All collected mosquitoes were morphologically and genetically (PCR) analysed in the laboratory. All collected anopheline and blood-fed mosquitoes were analysed for sporozoite infection and blood meal host preferences by Circumsporozoite Protein ELISA and blood meal ELISA, respectively. The differences between indoor and outdoor mosquito biting rates were analysed using generalized linear mixed models. Levels of resistance to commonly used insecticides were quantified by WHO susceptibility tests. Results: Out of 704 malaria vectors collected across 135 households, PCR analysis shows that 98.60% were Anopheles arabiensis, 0.6% Anopheles merus and 0.6% Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. Sporozoite ELISA analysis indicates that all mosquitoes were negative for the malaria parasite. The results show that more An. arabiensis were collected outdoor (similar to 85%) compared to indoor (similar to 15%). Furthermore, large numbers of An. arabiensis were caught in outdoor resting sites, where the pit trap (67.2%) collected more mosquitoes compared to the outdoor DN-Mini trap (32.8%). Nearly two-thirds (60.7%) of blood-fed mosquitoes had obtained blood meals from non-human hosts. Mosquitoes displayed non-uniform susceptibility status and resistance intensity among the tested insecticides across the study sites to all WHO recommended insecticides across the study sites. Conclusion: This study suggests that in contexts such as Zanzibar, testing of novel techniques to complement indoor protection and targeting outdoor biting and/or resting mosquitoes, may be warranted to complement existing interventions and contribute to malaria elimination efforts. The study highlights the need to implement novel interventions and/or adaptations of strategies that can target outdoors biting mosquitoes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据