4.5 Article

Development of novel ultra-sensitive IL-11 target engagement assays to support mechanistic PK/PD modeling for an anti-IL-11 antibody therapeutic

期刊

MABS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2022.2104153

关键词

Monoclonal antibody; antibody generation; target engagement; TE; biomarker; IL-11; bioanalytical assay; SPR; PK; PD; modeling; mechanistic modeling; antibody therapeutic; SP-X; MSD; simoa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An in-house antibody generation campaign successfully developed a novel ultra-sensitive target engagement assay for IL-11 and established baseline levels of IL-11. This has significant implications for drug development and preclinical research.
An in-house antibody generation campaign identified a diverse, high affinity set of anti-interleukin-11 (IL-11) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to enable successful development of novel, custom ultra-sensitive target engagement assays for detection of free (unbound to the dosed anti-IL-11 therapeutic mAb) and total (free and mAb-IL-11 complexed form) IL-11 in preclinical species and human. Antibody hits from distinct epitope communities were screened on various platforms, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Meso Scale Discovery, Simoa HD-1 and Simoa Planar Array (SP-X), and used for assay development and sensitivity optimization. The ultra-sensitive SP-X format achieved a lower limit of quantitation of 0.006 pg/mL, enabling the first reported baseline levels of IL-11 in healthy control plasma determined by custom bioanalytical assays. These newly established baseline levels supported mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in mouse, cynomolgus monkey, and human for a greater understanding of preclinical study design and in vivo dynamic interaction of soluble IL-11 with an anti-IL-11 antibody therapeutic candidate. Modeling and simulation also helped refine the utility of assays with respect to their potential use as target engagement biomarkers in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据