4.7 Article

Stability assessment of lutein under the existence of different phenolic acids

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113700

关键词

Lutein; Color stability; Phenolic acids; Food processing methods

资金

  1. Key R & D projects in Anhui Province [201904a06020050]
  2. Major Science and Technology Projects of Anhui Province [17030801018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of ten phenolic acids on the stability of lutein and found that rosmarinic acid, gallic acid, caffeic acid, and tannic acid significantly improved lutein stability. FTIR and NMR analyses revealed that lutein could interact with these phenolic acids through hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces.
The instability of lutein limited its application in the food industry. The study investigated the effects of ten phenolic acids (tannic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, syringic acid, rosmarinic acid, 3, 4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, caffeic acid, vanillic acid, coumalic acid, and chlorogenic acid) on the physical and chemical stability of lutein under dark/light and different temperatures. Moreover, the lutein stability with phenolic acids in food models was further assessed in different food processing methods and subsequent biscuit storage. The addition of ros-marinic acid, gallic acid, caffeic acid, and tannic acid significantly improved lutein stability during different conditions. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses indicated that lutein could interact with selected phenolic acids (rosmarinic acid, gallic acid, caffeic acid, and tannic acid) through hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces. Additionally, the lutein under the existence of selected phenolic acids presented strong thermal stability in different food processing methods. Compared with the storage for 9 days at 27 degrees C, these phenolic acids also exhibited significant protective effects on lutein in biscuits after the storage for 3 days.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据