4.6 Article

Construction of a Copper Bismuthate/Graphene Nanocomposite for Electrochemical Detection of Catechol

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 38, 期 33, 页码 10162-10172

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01151

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 110-2113-M-027-003]
  2. DST-PURSE [SR/PURSE Phase 2/38 (G)]
  3. MHRD-RUSA 2.0, Policy (TNMulti-Gen), Dept. of Edn. Govt. of India [F.24/51/2014-U]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a facile sonochemical strategy for synthesizing a copper bismuthate/graphene nanocomposite-modified screen-printed carbon electrode for the electrochemical detection of catechol. The fabricated nanocomposite exhibits excellent electro-catalytic performance and good selectivity.
Binary metal oxides with carbon nanocomposites have received extensive attention as research hotspots in the electrochemistry field owing to their tunable properties and superior stability. This work illustrates the development of a facile sonochemical strategy for the synthesis of a copper bismuthate/graphene (GR) nanocomposite-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (CBO/GR/SPCE) for the electrochemical detection of catechol (CT). The formation of an as-prepared CBO/GR nanocomposite was comprehensively characterized. The electrochemical behavior of the CBO/ GR/SPCE toward CT was investigated by voltammetry and amperometry techniques. The fabricated CBO/GR/SPCE manifests an excellent electro-catalytic performance toward CT with a lower peak potential and a higher current value compared to those of CBO/SPCE, GR/SPCE, and bare SPCE. It is attributed to enhanced electro-catalytic activity, synergetic effects, and good active sites of the CBO/GR nanocomposite. Under the electrochemical condition, the CBO/GR/SPCE displayed a wide linear sensing range, trace-level detection limit, acceptable sensitivity, and excellent selectivity. Furthermore, our proposed CBO/GR electrode was employed successfully for CT detection in water samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据