4.7 Article

From polyps to pixels: understanding coral reef resilience to local and global change across scales

期刊

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 737-752

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-022-01463-3

关键词

Scaling; Cross-scale; Remote sensing; Sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses how coral reef resilience is studied at different scales and explores emerging technologies that provide new insights. The authors also propose a framework for integrating insights across scales to guide management solutions.
Context Coral reef resilience is the product of multiple interacting processes that occur across various interacting scales. This complexity presents challenges for identifying solutions to the ongoing worldwide decline of coral reef ecosystems that are threatened by both local and global human stressors. Objectives We highlight how coral reef resilience is studied at spatial, temporal, and functional scales, and explore emerging technologies that are bringing new insights to our understanding of reef resilience. We then provide a framework for integrating insights across scales by using new and existing technological and analytical tools. We also discuss the implications of scale on both the ecological processes that lead to declines of reefs, and how we study those mechanisms. Methods To illustrate, we present a case study from KaneModified Letter Turned Commaohe Bay, HawaiModified Letter Turned Commai, USA, linking remotely sensed hyperspectral imagery to within-colony symbiont communities that show differential responses to stress. Results In doing so, we transform the scale at which we can study coral resilience from a few individuals to entire ecosystems. Conclusions Together, these perspectives guide best practices for designing management solutions that scale from individuals to ecosystems by integrating multiple levels of biological organization from cellular processes to global patterns of coral degradation and resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据