4.7 Article

Vaccine effectiveness of two-dose BNT162b2 against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland over time: a test-negative case-control study

期刊

LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 1577-1586

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00451-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council)
  2. Scottish Government
  3. Health Data Research UK BREATHE Hub
  4. Fiocruz, Fazer o Bem Faz Bem programme
  5. Brazilian National Research Council
  6. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the associations between time since two-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 and the occurrence of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland. The results showed that vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection started to decline from 27 days after the second dose, but protection against severe COVID-19 remained high.
Background Little is known about vaccine effectiveness over time among adolescents, especially against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant. This study assessed the associations between time since two-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 and the occurrence of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland. Methods We did test-negative, case-control studies in adolescents aged 12-17 years with COVID-19-related symptoms in Brazil and Scotland. We linked records of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and antigen tests to national vaccination and clinical records. We excluded tests from individuals who did not have symptoms, were vaccinated before the start of the national vaccination programme, received vaccines other than BNT162b2 or a SARS-CoV-2 booster dose of any kind, or had an interval between their first and second dose of fewer than 21 days. Additionally, we excluded negative SARS-CoV-2 tests recorded within 14 days of a previous negative test, negative tests recorded within 7 days after a positive test, any test done within 90 days after a positive test, and tests with missing sex and location information. Cases (SARS-CoV-2 test-positive adolescents) and controls (test-negative adolescents) were drawn from a sample of individuals in whom tests were collected within 10 days of symptom onset. We estimated the adjusted odds ratio and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 for both countries and against severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death) for Brazil across fortnightly periods. Findings We analysed 503 776 tests from 2 948 538 adolescents in Brazil between Sept 2, 2021, and April 19, 2022, and 127 168 tests from 404 673 adolescents in Scotland between Aug 6, 2021, and April 19, 2022. Vaccine effectiveness peaked at 14-27 days after the second dose in both countries during both waves, and was significantly lower against symptomatic infection during the omicron-dominant period in Brazil (64 center dot 7% [95% CI 63 center dot 0-66 center dot 3]) and in Scotland (82 center dot 6% [80 center dot 6-84 center dot 5]), than it was in the delta-dominant period (80 center dot 7% [95% CI 77 center dot 8-83 center dot 3] in Brazil and 92 center dot 8% [85 center dot 7-96 center dot 4] in Scotland). Vaccine efficacy started to decline from 27 days after the second dose for both countries, reducing to 5 center dot 9% (95% CI 2 center dot 2-9 center dot 4) in Brazil and 50 center dot 6% (42 center dot 7-57 center dot 4) in Scotland at 98 days or more during the omicron-dominant period. In Brazil, protection against severe disease remained above 80% from 28 days after the second dose and was 82 center dot 7% (95% CI 68 center dot 8-90 center dot 4) at 98 days or more after receiving the second dose. Interpretation We found waning vaccine protection of BNT162b2 against symptomatic COVID-19 infection among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland from 27 days after the second dose. However, protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes remained high at 98 days or more after the second dose in the omicron-dominant period. Booster doses for adolescents need to be considered. Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据