4.4 Article

Facile microfluidic method for measuring the relaxation time of dilute polymer solution based on viscoelastic particle focusing

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 2318-2323

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-022-1152-x

关键词

Relaxation Time; Dilute Polymer Solution; Viscoelasticity; Microchannel; Lateral Particle Migration

资金

  1. Ajou University Research Fund [S-2019-G0001-00498]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an efficient microfluidic method was proposed to measure the relaxation time of dilute polymer solutions by utilizing elasticity-driven lateral particle migration. The reliability of this method was confirmed by comparing the measured relaxation times with those obtained from Zimm theory. This approach is expected to be useful for characterizing the relaxation times of various polymer solutions.
The relaxation time of a viscoelastic fluid is an essential parameter for characterizing the degree of elasticity. However, measuring the relaxation time of dilute polymer solutions with low viscosity using conventional rotational rheometers remains challenging because of the low instrument sensitivity. In this study, we demonstrate an efficient microfluidic method for measuring the relaxation time of a dilute polymer solution by utilizing elasticity-driven lateral particle migration in a microchannel. First, the previous theoretical model was refined, based on the Oldroyd-B constitutive equation, in order to predict lateral particle migration in a viscoelastic fluid with constant shear viscosity, considering the inlet and finite particle size effects. This model was utilized to determine the relaxation times of dilute poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) aqueous solutions. Direct comparison of the measured relaxation times with those obtained from Zimm theory verified the reliability of the proposed method. The current approach is expected to be useful in characterizing the relaxation times of a wide range of polymer solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据