4.4 Article

Direct fabrication of graphitic carbon nitride-wrapped titanate nanotube arrays toward photoelectrochemical water oxidation in neutral medium

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 2523-2531

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-022-1132-1

关键词

TiO2 Nanotube Arrays; Graphitic Carbon Nitride; Water Splitting; Water Oxidation; Pyrolysis Deposition

资金

  1. HUTECH University [63/HD-DKC (2019/02/19/CNC)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A graphitic carbon nitride-wrapped titanate nanotube array (gC(3)N(4)-wrapped TNA) heterojunction photoelectrode was successfully fabricated via a chemical vapor deposition-like process, showing significant enhancement in current density and photo-response under visible light. The enhanced performance can be attributed to the effective charge separation at the gC(3)N(4)/TNA interfaces, leading to accelerated water splitting and oxygen generation. Additionally, the gC(3)N(4)-wrapped TNA photoelectrodes are developed under neutral conditions, making them highly applicable for practical devices.
Realizing a long-term, high-performance, and affordable photocatalytic setting for water splitting processes remains challenging despite the tremendous promise. We present a direct fabrication of graphitic carbon nitride-wrapped titanate nanotube array (gC(3)N(4)-wrapped TNA) heterojunction photoelectrodes via a chemical vapor deposition-like process that leverages the pyrolysis and sublimation of melamine at 500 degrees C. The gC(3)N(4)-wrapped TNA heterojunction photoelectrodes show a 16 times enhancement of current density and photo-response than bare TNAs. Such a remarkable enhancement comes from the effective charge separation of the gC(3)N(4)/TNA interfaces, consequently accelerating water splitting to generate oxygen under visible light. In addition, our gC(3)N(4)-wrapped TNA photoelectrodes are developed under a neutral condition that significantly increases their widespread use for practical devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据