4.2 Article

Water quality reliability based on an improved entropy in a water distribution system

期刊

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2022.066

关键词

improved water quality entropy (IWQE); water distribution system (WDS); water quality entropy (WQE); water quality reliability (WQR)

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20191147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposed a method using information entropy to measure water quality reliability in a water distribution system, and developed a water quality reliability evaluation method based on improved water quality entropy. The results showed a strong correlation between flow entropy and water quality entropy, as well as between improved flow entropy and improved water quality entropy.
In this paper, information entropy was proposed to measure water quality reliability in a water distribution system (WDS), which had been applied to evaluate hydraulic reliability in the WDS. In the water quality reliability evaluation, residual chlorine is a representative of water quality, and a first-order decay model was usually adopted. The water quality reliability (R) based on water quality entropy (WQE) and improved water quality reliability (R-d) based on improved water quality entropy (IWQE) were proposed and compared for three networks. The method was developed based on the EPANET toolkit and MATLAB environment. The results indicated that flow entropy (FE) is strongly related to WQE, and improved flow entropy (IFE) is also strongly related to IWQE. In addition, R-d can reflect the effect of pipe velocity, whereas R can only reflect the effects of pipe flow and the WDS layout. The novelty of this paper is to develop the entropy with consideration of the pipe velocity to measure water quality liability as a surrogate index, which can reduce the calculation load and can be applied to a nonlinear system. The proposed water quality reliability evaluation method based on information entropy can help design, analyze, and improve the water quality in the WDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据