4.6 Article

Genetic landscape of indolent and aggressive Kaposi sarcomas

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18463

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation AVEC
  2. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center CCSG [P30 CA016672]
  3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Leukaemia SPORE [P50 CA100632]
  4. US National Institutes of Health through the CCSG Bioinformatics Shared Resource at MD Anderson Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that aggressive Kaposi sarcoma (KS) differs significantly from indolent KS in terms of tumor mutational burden, with aggressive KS having a higher burden and a larger number of mutations.
Background Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a rare skin tumour caused by herpesvirus 8 infection and characterized by either indolence or an aggressive course necessitating systemic therapies. The genetic basis of this difference remains unknown. Objectives To explore the tumour mutational burden in indolent and aggressive KS. We compared genetic landscape including tumor mutational burden between the two forms of indolent and agressive KS. Methods We performed whole-exome sequencing on a cohort of 21 KS patients. We compared tumour mutational burden (TMB) between the two forms of KS and between KS tumours and tumours or other types. Results Aggressive KS tumours had a significantly higher TMB and a larger cumulative number of deleterious mutations than indolent KS tumours. In addition, all aggressive tumours had at least three deleterious mutations, whereas most indolent tumours harboured only one or no predicted deleterious mutations. Deleterious mutations listed in the Cancer Gene Census were detected exclusively in patients with aggressive disease. An analysis of somatic copy-number alterations (SCNA) revealed a tendency towards higher number of alterations in aggressive KS. Conclusions These data suggest that SCNA alterations and an increase in mutational burden promote aggressive KS and that it might be more appropriate to consider indolent KS as an opportunistic skin disease rather than a cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据