4.6 Article

Selective Oxidation of a Medium-Mn Third Generation Advanced High Strength Steel during Austenitizing and Intercritical Annealing

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac790a

关键词

-

资金

  1. International Zinc Association Galvanized Autobody Partnership (IZA-GAP) program
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [CRDPJ 522309-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of simulated continuous galvanizing process on the medium-Mn third generation advanced high strength steel was investigated. The study found that an intermediate flash pickling step can significantly reduce the thickness of external oxides on the steel surface, resulting in a surface with pure Fe and isolated external oxides.
The effect of the simulated continuous galvanizing line N-2-5 vol% H-2 process atmosphere oxygen partial pressure (pO(2)) on the external and internal selective oxidation of a prototype medium-Mn third generation (3G) advanced high strength steel was determined during a two-stage heat treatment cycle (i.e., austenitizing and intercritical annealing) which had previously yielded 3G properties. Thick external oxides (similar to 200 nm) were observed after the austenitizing heat treatment, regardless of the process atmosphere pO(2) employed. An intermediate flash pickling step was successful in reducing the external oxide thickness significantly (to similar to 30 nm) along with revealing some extruded metallic Fe nodules on the surface. The austenitizing heat treatment also resulted in a solute-depleted surface layer with a minimum thickness of 2 mu m. This solute-depleted layer inhibited the formation of external oxides during intercritical annealing, resulting in a surface similar to that observed after flash pickling comprising a near-pure Fe surface with isolated, nodular external oxides. These surfaces are promising in terms of successful reactive wetting of this prototype medium-Mn steel during subsequent continuous hot-dip galvanizing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据