4.6 Article

Potentiodynamic Polarization of Pure Metals and Alloys in Molten LiF-NaF-KF (FLiNaK) Using the K/K+ Dynamic Reference Electrode

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac7a66

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Energy University Program [DENE0008803]
  2. NSF through the University of Wisconsin Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-1720415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potentiodynamic polarization method using the K/K+ dynamic reference electrode was employed to investigate the corrosion behavior of Ni, Fe, Cr, Ni-20Cr binary alloy, and 316L stainless steel in molten FLiNaK salt at 700 degrees C. The results showed that Cr dissolved rapidly, while Ni and Fe remained stable in FLiNaK. Comparisons of the apparent redox potentials of different materials with respect to the K/K+ redox couple provided insights into the relationship between the applied potential and the dominant corrosion mechanism for each alloy. Polarized pure metals exhibited uniform surface recession, while corrosion in the alloys resulted in preferential dissolution of elements depending on the applied potential with respect to the K/K+ reference reaction.
The potentiodynamic polarization method using the K/K+ dynamic reference electrode was used to understand the corrosion behavior of Ni, Fe, Cr, the Ni-20Cr binary alloy, and 316L stainless steel in molten 46.5LiF-11.5NaF-42KF (FLiNaK, composition in mol %) salt at 700 degrees C. Exposure of the materials without an applied potential revealed that Ni and Fe were stable in FLiNaK, but Cr was dissolved rapidly. The apparent redox potentials of each material with respect to the K/K+ redox couple are compared to gain insight into how the applied potential relates to the dominant corrosion mechanism for each alloy. The polarized pure metals experienced uniform surface recession while corrosion in the alloys resulted in preferential elemental dissolution depending on the applied potential with respect to the K/K+ reference reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据