4.5 Article

Dynamic Response of Ion Mobility Spectrometry

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.2c00010

关键词

ion mobility spectrometry; dynamic response; peak shape analysis; temporal profile; second-order instruments; exponentially modified Gaussian

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the dynamic response of an Ion Mobility Spectrometer (IMS) to different inputs and developed a mathematical model based on two phenomena. The experimental results were in good correlation with the model predictions. The findings have practical implications for GC-IMS and IMS-based detectors.
Ion mobility spectrometers (IMS) are widely used in the security industry as well as in analytical measurements. Nevertheless, the IMS input is dynamic in nature because the sampling input can vary over time. Similar to most instruments, IMS is unable to respond immediately to variations in the input sample. Therefore, the measurements are made under transient conditions, which may affect the results. This work investigates the dynamic response of an IMS to different inputs, including steps, pulsed, exponential, and Gaussian functions. A theoretical model was developed based on two phenomena: the accumulation or dilution of a sample in the ionization region and the adsorption or desorption inside the injection port. Both processes have a charging/discharging nature. Thus, a mathematical expression was derived that takes into account two RC circuits in series. Fitting the output signal of the experimental data to the expression obtained from the model gave reasonable time constants of 2-4 s and 15-20 s for the dilution and the desorption processes, respectively. The model performance was evaluated by comparing the output with the experimental results, which were in excellent correlation. IMS was also found to behave in a manner similar to a second-order instrument, in which the output is related to the input via a second-order differential equation. These results are applicable to GC-IMS and IMS-based detectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据