4.7 Review

Emergency Department Communication in Persons Living With Dementia and Care Partners: A Scoping Review

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.02.024

关键词

Dementia; emergency medicine; communication; decision making; patient participation

资金

  1. National Institute of Aging of the National Institute of Health [R21/R33AG058926, R61/R33 AG069822]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article is a systematic scoping review that explores the communication strategies and decision-making process in the emergency department (ED) for persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners. The study identifies research gaps and priorities for future studies in this area.
Objectives: To synthesize published research exploring emergency department (ED) communication strategies and decision- making with persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners as the basis for a multistakeholder consensus conference to prioritize future research. Design: Systematic scoping review. Settings and Participants: PLWD and their care partners in the ED setting. Methods: Informed by 2 Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions, we conducted systematic electronic searches of medical research databases for relevant publications following standardized methodological guidelines. The results were presented to interdisciplinary stakeholders, including dementia researchers, clinicians, PLWD, care partners, and advocacy organizations. The PICO questions included: How does communication differ for PLWD compared with persons without dementia? Are there specific communication strategies that improve the outcomes of ED care? Future research areas were prioritized. Results: From 5451 studies identified for PICO-1, 21 were abstracted. From 2687 studies identified for PICO-2, 3 were abstracted. None of the included studies directly evaluated communication differences between PLWD and other populations, nor the effectiveness of specific communication strategies. General themes emerging from the scoping review included perceptions by PLWD/care partners of rushed ED communication, often exacerbated by inconsistent messages between providers. Care partners consistently reported limited engagement in medical decision-making. In order, the research priorities identified included: (1) Barriers/facilitators of effective communication; (2) valid outcome measures of effective communication; (3) best practices for care partner engagement; (4) defining how individual-, provider-, and system-level factors influence communication; and (5) understanding how each member of ED team can ensure high-quality communication. Conclusions and Implications: Research exploring ED communication with PLWD is sparse and does not directly evaluate specific communication strategies. Defining barriers and facilitators of effective communication was the highest-ranked research priority, followed by validating outcome measures associated with improved information exchange. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据