4.7 Article

Association of Medication Adherence With Health Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA Trial

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.045

关键词

chronic coronary disease; clinical trial; health status; medication adherence

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [5T32H110837]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ISCHEMIA trial examined the association between medication adherence and health status outcomes in patients with chronic coronary disease. The study found that nonadherence to medication was associated with worse health status at baseline and 12 months, regardless of treatment strategy. Strategies to improve medication adherence are needed to improve health status outcomes in patients with chronic coronary disease.
BACKGROUND The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial randomized participants with chronic coronary disease (CCD) to guideline-directed medical therapy with or without angiography and revascularization. The study examined the association of nonadherence with health status outcomes. OBJECTIVES The study sought to compare 12-month health status outcomes of adherent and nonadherent participants with CCD with an a priori hypothesis that nonadherent patients would have better health status if randomized to invasive management. METHODS Self-reported medication-taking behavior was assessed at randomization with a modified 4-item MoriskyGreen-Levine Adherence Scale, and participants were classified as adherent or nonadherent. Twelve-month health status was assessed with the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) summary score (SS), which ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score = better). The association of adherence with outcomes was evaluated using Bayesian proportional odds models, including an interaction by study arm (conservative vs invasive). RESULTS Among 4,480 randomized participants, 1,245 (27.8%) were nonadherent at baseline. Nonadherent participants had worse baseline SAQ-7 SS in both conservative (72.9 +/- 19.3 vs 75.6 +/- 18.4) and invasive (71.0 +/- 19.8 vs 74.2 +/- 18.7) arms. In adjusted analyses, adherence was associated with higher 12-month SAQ-7 SS in both treatment groups (mean difference in SAQ-7 SS with conservative treatment = 1.6 [95% credible interval: 0.3-2.9] vs with invasive management =1.9 [95% credible interval: 0.8-3.1]), with no interaction by treatment. CONCLUSIONS More than 1 in 4 participants reported medication nonadherence, which was associated with worse health status in both conservative and invasive treatment strategies at baseline and 12 months. Strategies to improve medication adherence are needed to improve health status outcomes in CCD, regardless of treatment strategy. (C) 2022 the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据