4.6 Article

ISG-SLAS: Secure and lightweight authentication and key agreement scheme for industrial smart grid using fuzzy extractor

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2022.102698

关键词

Industrial smart grid; Cryptographic protocol; Authentication; Key agreement; Fuzzy extractor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smart grid has gained significant attention due to its various services, but it is vulnerable to security attacks. To address this issue, we propose a secure and lightweight authentication and key agreement scheme using a fuzzy extractor. We evaluate the scheme's security and efficiency through simulations and experiments.
Smart grid (SG) has been received significant attention due to various services such as renewable energy and demand response. However, SG is fragile to various security attacks because an adversary can eavesdrop, insert, delete, or intercept the exchanged messages over an open channel. Thus, secure and lightweight authentication and key agreement (AKA) scheme for SG to ensure the necessary security requirements. Recently, the existing schemes designed a secure and efficient AKA protocol for industrial SG using cryptographic primitives to ensure reliable energy services. However, we prove that existing schemes for industrial SG are vulnerable to potential security attacks and do not guarantee the necessary security requirements. To enhance the security flaws of the existing schemes, we design a secure and lightweight AKA scheme for SG using fuzzy extractor, called ISG-SLAS. ISG-SLAS resists various security attacks and provides security functionalities. We evaluate the security of the ISG-SLAS using ROR model and AVISPA simulation. Moreover, we present the testbed experiments using MIRACL based on Raspberry PI 4. We then present a comparative analysis between ISG-SLAS and related schemes. Consequently, ISG-SLAS better ensures security and efficiency compared with related schemes and is more suitable than related schemes for practical SG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据