4.5 Article

Pedicled vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap for sacropelvic defects after wide oncologic resection: Wound complications and outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 126, 期 6, 页码 978-985

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.27006

关键词

chondrosarcoma; osteosarcoma; reconstruction; sacropelvic malignancy; vastus lateralis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 28 patients who underwent reconstruction employing a pedicled vastus lateralis flap after wide resection of primary sacropelvic malignancies. The study found that even in a cohort with high baseline risk for wound complications, the use of a pedicled vastus lateralis flap is a safe reconstructive option.
Background and Objectives Adequate coverage of the soft tissue defects from wide resection of sacropelvic malignancies remains challenging. The vastus lateralis flap has been described for coverage in the setting of trauma and infection. This flap has not been described for coverage of sacropelvic tumor defects. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent wide resection of a primary sacropelvic malignancy with reconstruction employing a pedicled vastus lateralis flap at two tertiary care centers. Patient demographics, tumor staging, and rate of complications were assessed. Results Twenty-eight patients were included, with a median age of 51 years. The most common primary tumor was chondrosarcoma followed by chondroblastic osteosarcoma. The median follow-up was 1.1 years. There were 10 cases of wound infection requiring re-operation and three cases of flap failure. Conclusions We describe a pedicled vastus lateralis flap for coverage of defects after wide resection of sacropelvic malignancies. A large proportion of our cohort had independent risk factors for wound complications. Even with a cohort with high baseline risk for wound complications, we show that the use of a pedicled vastus lateralis flap is a safe reconstructive option with a wound complication rate in line with the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据