4.6 Article

Changes in acceleration load as measured by inertial measurement units manifest in the upper body after an extended running task

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
卷 40, 期 13, 页码 1467-1475

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2086520

关键词

Ground reaction force; impact; metabolic; area under the curve

资金

  1. Macquarie University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the behavior of physiological load measures, ground reaction forces, and acceleration load during a prolonged running task that simulated the running demands of an intermittent team sport. The results showed that running had a significant impact on the external mechanical load in the upper body, which could be effectively measured by area under the curve (AUC).
The purpose of this study was to investigate the behaviour of physiological load measures as well as ground reaction forces (GRF) and acceleration load during a prolonged running task that simulated the running demands of an intermittent team sport. Nineteen males completed a maximal aerobic fitness test and an extended running protocol across two sessions. Participants wore a portable metabolic system, and four inertial measurement units (IMU), one on each foot, the lower back and upper back. GRF were measured via an instrumented treadmill. Change in metabolic, IMU and GRF variables across five blocks during the running protocol were assessed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA. The running protocol elicited large increases in heart rate and oxygen consumption over time. No statistically significant changes in any peak impact accelerations were observed. Resultant acceleration area under the curve (AUC) increased at the lower and upper back locations but was unchanged at the foot. GRF active peak but not impact peak increased during the prolonged run. The results of this study indicate that the effect of an extended running task on IMU measures of external mechanical load is manifested in the upper body, and is effectively measured by AUC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据