4.8 Article

Insight to Se-doping effects on Fe7S8/carbon nanotubes composite as anode for sodium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 536, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231458

关键词

Fe7S8; Se-doping; CNTs; Anode material; Sodium-ion batteries

资金

  1. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for Student of Henan province [202111765001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the potential of selenium-doped iron-based sulfides in sodium-ion battery anodes through the synthesis and performance testing of carbon nanotube-modified selenium-doped Fe7S8 (Fe7S8-xSex/CNTs) materials.
Iron based sulfides are considered as promising candidates for sodium-ion battery anodes. However, the inferior cyclic stability and poor capability hinder their practical application. In this study, a series of Se-doped Fe7S8 modified by carbon nanotubes (Fe7S8-xSex/CNTs) are synthesized through heat treatment and following selenization process. The composition of hybrids can be easily controlled by tuning the proportion of precursors. Electrochemical tests reveal that Fe7S8-xSex/CNTs with optimized nano-structure and composition displays improved sodium storage performances. Specifically, a discharge capacity of 303.4 mAh g(-1) can be obtained at a high current of 4 A g(-1). In addition, a remarkable capacity of 313.6 mAh g(-1) is obtained after 1000 cycles at 2 A g(-1), corresponding to a capacity retention of 67.7%. Sodium storage kinetic analysis suggests that Fe7S7Se1/CNTs electrode exhibit an enhanced capacitive-controlled process and improved sodium diffusion coefficient. Density functional theory (DFT) calculation results manifest that Fe7S7Se1 present a stronger binding energy with Na atoms and a decreased Na+ diffusion barriers, which are responsible for the superior electrochemical performances. These results demonstrate that Se-doping of iron based sulfides may be a feasible strategy to develop high performance sodium-ion battery anodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据