4.4 Article

Properties of silica/natural rubber composite film and foam: Effects of silica content and sulfur vulcanization system

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMER RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-022-03129-9

关键词

Sulfur vulcanization; Silica; Natural rubber composite; Natural rubber foam; Natural rubber sheet

资金

  1. National Nanotechnology Center (Nanotech), NSTDA, Ministry of Science and Technology, Thailand, through its program of Research Network NANOTEC (RNN) Kasetsart University
  2. Thailand Research Fund [MRG5980252]
  3. Center of Excellence on Petrochemical and Materials Technology (PETROMAT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigated the effects of silica content and sulfur vulcanization system on the mechanical properties of silica-filled natural rubber (NR) composite. The study found that treated silica exhibited better mechanical properties, and rubber vulcanized with the conventional sulfur vulcanization system showed superior mechanical properties compared to other systems.
This research paper investigated the effects of the silica content and the sulfur vulcanization system on the mechanical properties of silica-filled natural rubber (NR) composite film and foam to be used in various applications. Three different sulfur vulcanization systems (conventional (CV), semi-efficient (Semi-EV), and efficient (EV)) were thoroughly studied to improve the quality of vulcanized NR and their composite with silica. The ground silica was treated with Silane 69. Scanning Electron Microscope demonstrated that the treated silica in NR was well dispersed. In addition, the treated silica resulted in better mechanical properties than for untreated silica. The optimum amount of silica in non-vulcanized rubber was 16 phr. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of vulcanized rubber from the CV system were better than those from the Semi-EV and EV systems due to the higher degree of crosslinking in the former. In addition, when the TSi/NR composite foam specimens at 8 phr had an applied load that was 4.41 times that of non-silica rubber foam.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据