4.5 Article

Floquet topological properties in the non-Hermitian long-range system with complex hopping amplitudes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
卷 34, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac8a37

关键词

Floquet; non-Hermitian; topology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874190, 61835013, 12047501]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0301500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals a direct connection between the winding number calculated in the framework of the Bloch band theory and the number of edge states in the periodic driving non-Hermitian model. It also demonstrates that changes in the phase of the hopping amplitude can induce topological phase transitions. Moreover, the introduction of a purely imaginary hopping term leads to an extremely rich phase diagram, and even topological invariants can be selected from unlimited winding numbers when only considering the next-nearest neighbor hopping term.
Non-equilibrium phases of matter have attracted much attention in recent years, among which the Floquet phase is a hot point. In this work, based on the periodic driving non-Hermitian model, we reveal that the winding number calculated in the framework of the Bloch band theory has a direct connection with the number of edge states even though the non-Hermiticity is present. Further, we find that the change of the phase of the hopping amplitude can induce the topological phase transitions. Precisely speaking, the increase in the value of the phase can bring the system into a topological phase with a large topological number. Moreover, it can be unveiled that the introduction of the purely imaginary hopping term brings an extremely rich phase diagram. In addition, we can select the even topological invariant exactly from the unlimited winding numbers if we only consider the next-nearest neighbor hopping term. Here, the results obtained may be useful for understanding the periodic driving non-Hermitian theory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据