4.8 Article

Tuning the Diradical Character of Indolocarbazoles: Impact of Structural Isomerism and Substitution Position

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 6003-6010

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01325

关键词

-

资金

  1. Univesidad de Malaga/CBUA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the efficiency of structural isomerism and substitution position in controlling the optical and electronic properties of ICz-based systems, with meta-substituted systems with a V-shaped structure displaying the largest diradical character. This work contributes to elucidating the chemical reactivity and physical properties of diradicaloid systems, guiding experimental chemists to produce new molecules with desirable properties.
In this study, a set of 10 positional indolocarbazole (ICz) isomers substituted with dicyanomethylene groups connected via para or meta positions are computationally investigated with the aim of exploring the efficiency of structural isomerism and substitution position in controlling their optical and electronic properties. Unrestricted density functional theory (DFT), a spin-flip time-dependent DFT approach, and the multireference CASSCF/NEVPT2 method have been applied to correlate the diradical character with the energetic trends (i.e., singlet-triplet energy gaps). In addition, the nucleus-independent chemical shift together with ACID plots and Raman intensity calculations were used to strengthen the relationship between the diradical character and (anti)aromaticity. Our study reveals that the substitution pattern and structural isomerism represent a very effective way to tune the diradical properties in ICz-based systems with meta-substituted systems with a V-shaped structure displaying the largest diradical character. Thus, this work contributes to the elucidation of the challenging chemical reactivity and physical properties of diradicaloid systems, guiding experimental chemists to produce new molecules with desirable properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据