4.8 Article

Kinetic Mechanism of Amyloid-β-(16-22) Peptide Fibrillation

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01065

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP17H06704, JP19K16086, JP16K18860, 20K06998, JP17H02941]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K06998] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the kinetic mechanism of amyloid fibril formation by a peptide fragment containing seven residues of the amyloid-beta protein Aβ-(16-22). The results show that the unprotected peptide fragment can rapidly form fibrils in a neutral aqueous buffer solution, and the fibrillation kinetics can be described by the nucleation-elongation model. The width of the fibrils increases over time, possibly due to lateral association. Electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions play important roles in the fibrillation process.
The kinetic mechanism of amyloid fibril formation by a peptide fragment containing seven residues of the amyloid-beta protein A beta-(16-22) was investigated. We found that the N- and C-terminal unprotected A beta-(16-22), containing no aggregation nuclei, showed rapid fibrillation within seconds to minutes in a neutral aqueous buffer solution. The fibrillation kinetics were well described by the nucleation-elongation model, suggesting that primary nucleation was the rate-limiting step. On the basis of both experimental and theoretical analyses, the aggregated nucleus was estimated to be composed of 6-7 peptide molecules, wherein the two beta-sheets were associated with their hydrophobic surfaces. Thin fibers with widths of 10-20 nm were formed, which increased their length and thickness, attaining a width of >20 nm over several tens of minutes, probably owing to the lateral association of the fibers. Electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions play important roles in aggregation. These results provide a basis for understanding the fibrillation of short peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据