4.8 Article

Bicarbonate Rebalances the *COOH/*OCO- Dual Pathways in CO2 Electrocatalytic Reduction: In Situ Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Evidence

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 13, 期 13, 页码 7296-7305

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01372

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42192571, 21827815]
  2. Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science [GrantRCEES-TDZ-2021-7]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the interfacial behaviors between the reactive site, CO2, and electrolyte is crucial for designing an effective CO2 electrocatalytic reduction system. This study reveals that HCO3- can facilitate the generation of *OCO- on Ag-based catalysts, thereby rebalancing the CO2ER pathways. The findings suggest that careful selection of electrolytes can regulate the CO2ER pathway and product distribution.
Understanding the reactive site/CO2/electrolyte interfacial behaviors is very crucial for the design of an advantageous CO2 electrocatalytic reduction (CO2ER) system. One important but unrevealed question is how the CO2ER process is influenced by the high concentration of HCO3- , which is deliberately added as electrolyte or from the inevitable reaction between dissolved CO2 and OH-. Here, we provide unambiguous in situ spectroscopic evidence that on Ag-based catalysts, HCO3- is apt to facilitate *OCO- generation and therefore rebalances CO2ER pathways. By employing an alternative acid electrolyte to restrict the exchange between CO2 and HCO3- and eliminating the effect of solution pH, we reveal that HCO3- can decrease the onset potential of *OCO- and promote further formate production. Theoretical calculations indicate HCO3- can stabilize the adsorption of *OCO- instead of *COOH. The renewed understanding of the role of HCO3- could facilitate the judicious selection of electrolytes to regulate the CO2ER pathway and product distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据