4.7 Article

Cu(II)-Catalyzed Unsymmetrical Dioxidation of gem-Difluoroalkenes to Generate α,α-Difluorinated-α-phenoxyketones

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00925

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R35 GM124661]
  2. NIH Shared Instrumentation Grants [S10OD016360, S10RR024664]
  3. NSF Major Research Instrumentation Grants [9977422, 0320648]
  4. NIH Center Grant [P20GM103418]
  5. Vicki & Patrick F. Stone family
  6. National Science Foundation [CHE-1352663]
  7. NSF Phase-2 CCI, Center for Sustainable Materials Chemistry [CHE-1102637]
  8. N.L. Tartar Summer Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Cu-based catalyst system was used to synthesize α,α-difluorinated ketone esters by coupling gem-difluoroalkenes with phenols under aerobic conditions. These compounds, which contain rare α,α-difluorinated ketone and α,α-difluorinated ether moieties, can serve as synthetic intermediates to access other useful fluorinated functional groups.
A Cu-based catalyst system convergently couples gem-difluoroalkenes with phenols under aerobic conditions to deliver alpha,alpha-difluorinated-alpha-phenoxyketones, an unstudied hybrid fluorinated functional group. Composed of alpha,alpha-difluorinated ketone and alpha,alpha-difluorinated ether moieties, these compounds have rarely been reported as a synthetic intermediate. Computational predictions and later experimental corroboration suggest that the phenoxy-substituted fluorinated ketone's sp(3)-hybridized hydrate form is energetically favored relative to the respective nonether variant and that perturbation of the electronic character of the ketone can further encourage the formation of the hydrate. The more facile conversion between ketone and hydrate forms suggests that analogues should readily covalently inhibit proteases and other enzymes. Further functionalization of the ketone group enables access to other useful fluorinated functional groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据