4.1 Article

A field-portable colorimetric method for the measurement of peracetic acid vapors: a comparison of glass and plastic impingers

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2022.2088772

关键词

DPD; disinfectant; occupational exposure monitoring; PAA; peroxide; peroxyacetic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for measuring peracetic acid vapors in air using impinger sampling and field-portable colorimetric analysis is presented. The method measures the capture efficiency of aqueous media in glass and plastic impingers, and uses an N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine colorimetric method with a field-portable spectrometer for measuring peracetic acid. The method allows for easy and rapid in-field measurement and is suitable for evaluating occupational exposure to peracetic acid.
A method for measuring peracetic acid vapors in air using impinger sampling and field-portable colorimetric analysis is presented. The capture efficiency of aqueous media in glass and plastic impingers was evaluated when used for peracetic acid vapor sampling. Measurement of peracetic acid was done using an N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine colorimetric method with a field-portable spectrometer. The linearity of the N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine method was determined for peracetic acid both in solution and captured from vapor phase using glass or plastic impingers. The Limits of Detection for the glass and plastic impingers were 0.24 mg/m(3) and 0.28 mg/m(3), respectively, for a 15 L air sample. The Limits of Quantitation were 0.79 mg/m(3) and 0.92 mg/m(3) for the glass and plastic impingers, respectively. Both metrics were below the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Threshold Limit Value Short-Term Exposure Limit of 1.24 mg/m(3) (0.4 ppmv) during a 15-min period. The impinger sampling method presented herein allows for an easy-to-use and rapid in-field measurement that can be used for evaluating occupational exposure to peracetic acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据