4.5 Article

Effect of sustained release of rhBMP-2 from dried and wet hyaluronic acid hydrogel carriers compared with direct dip coating of rhBMP-2 on peri-implant osteogenesis of dental implants in canine mandibles

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 116-125

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.11.018

关键词

Peri-implant osteogenesis; Hyaluronic acid hydrogel; Dried coating; Dip coating; rhBMP-2

资金

  1. Seoul National University Dental Hospital (SNUDH) Research Fund, Republic of Korea [03-2008-0013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel has been used as a carrier of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 for sustained delivery. To enhance peri-implant osteogenesis, a dried coating of rhBMP-2 HA hydrogel (BMP-HAH) on dental implants was designed; this approach provides the advantage of omitting in situ preparation of wet HA hydrogel. Sustained release of rhBMP-2 was more efficient for dried hydrogel over wet hydrogel. For both types, the released rhBMP-2 consistently led to enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity and osterix expression in human mesenchymal stromal cells. Histomorphometric analysis 4 weeks after placement of a dental implant in canine mandibles showed that the dried coating of BMP-HAH (10 mu g/ml, n = 6) resulted in a significantly greater bone area (BA) than the wet BMP-HAH (10 mu g/ml, n = 6) (p = 0.006) and implants without any coating (n = 6) (p = 0.022), while simple dip coating with rhBMP-2 (10 mu g/ml, n = 6) resulted in significantly greater BA than the other three groups (p < 0.0005). Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly different only between the dried and wet coating of BMP-HAH (p = 0.014). Our results suggest that a simple dip coating of rhBMP-2 is more effective for increased ped-implant osteogenesis compared to a coating of BMP-HAH with sustained release. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据