4.7 Article

The epidemiology of dystonia: the Hannover epidemiology study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 269, 期 12, 页码 6483-6493

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11310-9

关键词

Dystonia; Epidemiology; Prevalence; Cervical dystonia; Blepharospasm; Writer's cramp; Tardive dystonia; Musician's dystonia; Psychogenic dystonia; Functional dystonia; Generalised dystonia; Spasmodic dysphonia; Segmental dystonia; Arm dystonia; Oromandibular dystonia; Botulinum toxin therapy

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of dystonia and evaluate its importance for patients, therapy, and the healthcare system. The results showed that the prevalence of dystonia is higher than previously believed and varies among different types of dystonia.
The prevalence of dystonia has been studied since the 1980s. Due to different methodologies and due to varying degrees of awareness, resulting figures have been extremely different. We wanted to determine the prevalence of dystonia according to its current definition, using quality-approved registries and based on its relevance for patients, their therapy and the health care system. We applied a service-based chart review design with the City of Hannover as reference area and a population of 525,731. Barrier-free comprehensive dystonia treatment in few highly specialised centres for the last 30 years should have generated maximal dystonia awareness, a minimum of unreported cases and a high degree of data homogeneity. Prevalence [n/1mio] and relative frequency is 601.1 (100%) for all forms of dystonia, 251.1 (42%) for cervical dystonia, 87.5 (15%) for blepharospasm, 55.2 (9%) for writer's cramp, 38.0 (6%) for tardive dystonia, 32.3 (5%) for musician's dystonia, 28.5 (5%) for psychogenic dystonia, 26.6 (4%) for generalised dystonia, 24.7 (4%) for spasmodic dysphonia, 20.9 (3%) for segmental dystonia, 15.2 (3%) for arm dystonia and 13.3 (2%) for oromandibular dystonia. Leg dystonia, hemidystonia and complex regional pain syndrome-associated dystonia are very rare. Compared to previous meta-analytical data, primary or isolated dystonia is 3.3 times more frequent in our study. When all forms of dystonia including psychogenic, generalised, tardive and other symptomatic dystonias are considered, our dystonia prevalence is 3.7 times higher than believed before. The real prevalence is likely to be even higher. Having based our study on treatment necessity, our data will allow better allocation of resources for comprehensive dystonia treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据