4.4 Article

Impacts of graphitic nanofertilizers on nitrogen cycling in a sandy, agricultural soil

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-022-05500-9

关键词

Graphitic nanomaterials; Nanofertilizer; Nitrogen cycle; Nitrate leaching; Soil respiration

资金

  1. [NNCI-ECCS-1542160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene nanofertilizers can potentially suppress nitrification and reduce nitrate leaching in agricultural soils, affecting soil microbial communities and N cycle.
Graphene nanofertilizers have demonstrated immense potential in improving agricultural productivity and nitrogen management. However, how those nanomaterials interact with soil microbial communities related to N cycle remain unclear. The present study assessed the impact of four different graphitic nanomaterials (i.e., GO, graphene oxide; rGO, reduced graphene oxide; GNP, graphene nanoplatelet; GNA, graphite nanoadditive) and biochar at two different doses (5 and 1000 mg kg(-1) soil) on soil respiration, nitrification potential, and microbial N cycling functional genes over 28 days of incubation of sandy agricultural soil. Basal respiration indicated a transient increase of microbial activity with all treatments, while substrate induced respiration (SIR) revealed an enhancement of microbial respiration rate with some treatments that sustained at the end of the incubation. No significant differences in the maximum nitrification potential were observed when treated with GNMs or biochar. However, decreased abundances of amoA genes and increased abundance of denitrifying genes (nirK, nirS, nosZ) in all treated soils suggested a decreased potential for nitrification and boosted denitrification after 28-day exposure. In addition, GNMs showed minimum impact on nifH population in this incubation study. Together, the results suggest that graphitic nanomaterials might suppress nitrification and potentially reduce losses by nitrate leaching in agricultural soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据