4.6 Article

Diverse coordination of dipicolinic acid to Pd(II) ion result antitumor complexes, their interaction with CT-DNA by spectroscopic experiments and computational methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132937

关键词

Pd(II) complexes; Dipicolinic acid; Cytotoxicity; DNA-binding

资金

  1. University of Sistan and Baluchestan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three metal complexes with picolinic acid coordinated to palladium were synthesized and analyzed using DFT calculations. The complex with zero charge showed better cytotoxic and DNA interaction affinity, indicating its potential for further development as a therapeutic agent.
Three metal complexes wherein picolinic acid (dipic) diversely coordinated to palladium with formula trans-[Pd(Hdipic)(2)].2H(2)O ( I ), K[Pd(dipic)Cl].H2O ( II ) and trans-Na-2[Pd(dipic)2].2H(2)O ( III ) had been selected from literature and accordingly made them in our laboratory. Complex ions of these three compounds bear 0.00 ( I ),-1.00 ( II ), and-2.00 ( III ) charges. In this study, DFT calculations i.e., molecular geometry analysis, molecular electrostatic potential map and frontier molecular orbital analysis were performed for the Pd(II) complexes I, II and III . Preliminary cytotoxic activity of them along with carboplatin as standard, against cancer cell line MCF-7, showed the promising effect. Thus in-detail interaction of I, II , and III with calf thymus DNA was investigated through spectrophotometric, fluorometric, partition coefficient, viscometric measurement, gel electrophoresis, and docking assay for more analysis. All the data obtained from these above studies indicate that the complex with zero charge ( I ) shows better cytotoxic and DNA interaction affinity than the II and III having-1.00 and-2.00 charges which might be due to their repulsion by negative charges present on phosphate diester of the DNA backbone. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据