4.7 Article

Polyethersulfone/polyvinylpyrrolidone/boron nitride composite membranes for high proton conductivity and long-term stability high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 653, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120512

关键词

HT-PEMFC; Composite membrane; Boron nitride; Proton conduction; Durability

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFB0106602]
  2. DICP Innovation Fund Foundation [DICP I202115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A PES-PVP-BN composite membrane with well-dispersed BN nanosheets and enhanced interaction force with PA was successfully fabricated, improving its proton conductivity and stability for HT-PEMFC applications.
Proton exchange membranes have excellent proton conductivity and long-term endurance vital for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs). Herein, a polyethersulfone (PES)/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/boron nitride (BN) (PES-PVP-BN) composite membrane was fabricated successfully. The well-dispersion of BN nanosheets in the PES-PVP-BN composite membrane was demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry mapping. Benefiting from the interaction force between BN nanosheets with phosphoric acid (PA), the PA doping level (ADL) and conductivity of the blend membrane have been improved. In addition, the interaction force between the PVP@BN system and PA has been demonstrated by theoretical calculations, which enhances the anchoring effect of BN to PA compared with the PES-PVP membrane significantly. Thus, the PES-PVP-0.5% BN composite membrane exhibited the best proton conductivity (107.42 mS cm(-1)) and peak power density (359 mW cm(-2)) at 160 C under the same device operation conditions. Furthermore, the PES-PVP-0.5% BN composite membrane exhibited outstanding longterm stability during a 100 h test, demonstrating the PES-PVP-BN composite membrane as a candidate material for HT-PEMFC applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据