4.3 Article

Detection of Wolbachia in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the State of Maranhao, Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 59, 期 5, 页码 1831-1836

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjac092

关键词

endosymbiont; natural infection; arasite; biological vector; Wolbachia

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico do Maranhao (FAPEMA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the natural infection rate of Wolbachia in Culicidae species in Maranhao, Brazil. Out of 448 mosquitoes analyzed, Wolbachia DNA was detected in 7 species. The study provides important knowledge about the prevalence of Wolbachia in the culicid fauna.
Recently, the endobacteria Wolbachia has emerged as a biological tool for the control of arboviruses. Thus, we investigated the rate of natural infection by Wolbachia in Culicidae species from Maranhao, Brazil. For this, we amplified the Wolbachia surface protein gene (wsp) from mosquitoes collected in six localities of Maranhao, and positive samples were subjected to new analysis using group-specific primers. In total, 448 specimens comprising 6 genera and 18 species of mosquitoes were analyzed. Wolbachia DNA was PCR-detected in 7 species, three of which are new records: Aedes scapularis (Rondani, 1848), Coquillettidia juxtamansonia (Chagas, 1907) and Cq. venezuelensis (Theobald, 1912), in addition to Ae. albopictus (Skuse, 1894) and Culex quinquefasciatus Say, 1823, which are commonly described as permissive to maintain this bacterium in natural environments, and two species of the subgenera Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) Blanchard, 1902 and Culex (Melanoconion) Theobald, 1903 which could not be identified at species level. The infection rate of all species ranged from 0 to 80%, and the average value was 16.5%. This study increases the knowledge about the prevalence of Wolbachia in the culicid fauna and may help in selecting strains for biological control purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据